INTRODUCTION
While the
macro-sociological approach stresses the broad features of society, the
micro-sociological approach has a narrow focus placing emphasis on
‘face-to-face interaction’, on what people do when they are in one another
presence. This unit therefore presents cooperation, adjustment and opposition
as major social processes.
Social Interaction
Every person surrounds
himself/herself with personal space which is protected. While friends,
children, parents and so on, may be very physically close to us, we create
sufficient gaps between us and “outsiders”. Four main distance space or zones
are commonly used:
i. Intimate distance:
This is a space very close to the individual’s body. The space is reserved for
love-making, comforting, protecting, hugging and intimate touching.
ii. Personal distance:
This zone extends from 18 inches to 4 feet. It is reserved for friends, and
acquaintances and ordinary conversation.
iii .Social distance:
It extends out from us about 4 to 12 feet. It marks impersonal or formal
relationships. We use this zone for such things as job interviews.
Iv. Public distance:
This zone, extending beyond 12 feet, marks even more formal relationships. It
is used to separate dignitaries and public speakers from the general public.
Sociologist, Ervin Goffman developed the concept of “dramaturgy”. By this, he
meant that social life is like a drama or the stage. Birth ushers us onto the
stage of everyday life, and our socialization consists of learning to perform
on that stage. The self lies at the centre of our performances. We have
definite ideas of how we want others to think of us, and we use our roles to communicate
those ideas. Goffman calls these efforts to manage the impressions that others
receive of us “impression management”.
The various groups that
exist in societies are not static. They change and are modified. Interaction
among members of a group and among groups is continually taking place. In
sociological sense, “interaction” refers to behaviour or action that is symbolic
– verbal and gestural. The behaviour is directed toward others, and the
individual is aware of how others will probably respond. Interaction is
reciprocal; each is aware of and responsive to the actions and reactions of
others. Although interaction is not governed by rigid rules, it is not
completely haphazard, either. There are enough pattern and repetitions for us
to study and predict human behaviour in given situations. We and others in our
society, follow these patterns to simplify our lives. In small, non technological,
homogenous societies, most interaction is structured. In complex societies,
however, we face situations for which we do not have established patterns of
behaviour. Whether established long ago or fairly recently, a number of key patterns
of interaction are present in all societies. These key patterns constitute “the
microelements of social bonds, or the molecular cement of society”. One or more
of these patterns, also called “social process” are at work any time
interaction takes place.
Major Social Processes
The following are few
fundamental forms of interaction of individuals and groups.
Opposition
This is divided into
two types:
(a) Opposition in form
of conflict: In the process individuals or groups
deliberately and forcefully try to prevent each other from the
realization of wishes, purposes and interests. The intensity of conflict
varies from verbal opposition to another’s will to physical destruction.
The most important types of contemporary conflict are class and racial conflict,
and political and military conflict. These forms of conflict may be
organized or unorganized. They use both intellectual and physical weapons
and find their expressions in riots, revolutions and warfare.
(b) Opposition in form
of Competition: This is a process in which individuals
or group strives against each other for the use or ownership of limited
goods, positions or rewards. Competition in contrast with conflict stops
short of deliberate coercion. It is tempered by moral and often by legal
norms.
Competition can be:
1. Absolute if only one
of the contending parties can win. An example is the competition for
governorship of a State.
2. Relative if the
competitors expect only to obtain some degree of the desired value. An example
of this is competition for wealth or prestige.
3. Pure or
unrestricted: This does not involve a measure of cooperative effort such as
adherence to culturally defined rules.
4. Limited or
restricted if a measure of cooperative effort such as adherence to culturally
defined rules are involved.
5. Personal if each
rival is aware of the existence of his contenders.
6. Impersonal if each
rival is not aware of the existence of his contenders. The competition of
modern corporations for customers is largely impersonal.
Cooperation
Cooperation is a
process-situation in which individuals or groups work together to perform a
task or to reach a commonly valued goal. Cooperation can be in any of the
following forms.
(a) Primary Cooperation:
This prevails in small (primary) groups such as families and ethnic groups
where little room is left for the distinction between groups life and
individual purposes.
(b) Secondary Cooperation:
Secondary groups such as modern industrial organizations are mainly based on
the bureaucratic, rational, formal, specialized processes of secondary
cooperation. In this sense, the cooperating group members make only a clearly defined
part of their lives available to common endeavours.
(c) Antagonistic
Cooperation: This represents a precarious working relationship
which is overshadowed by latent conflict. In this spirit, two hostile parties
or nations with opposing goals may cooperate for a certain time to defeat a
common enemy.
(d) Coerced
Cooperation: This may be mentioned as a distorted semblance
of cooperation in which some of the participants only go along to alleviate
hardships or to escape punishment. Convicts or defeated people extend this type
of cooperation to their overseers.
(e) Consensus:
This process leads all group members or contending groups to conscious and rational’
agreements defining the nature and extent of cooperation. The achievement of
consensus is very important in modern economic and political processes which
are based on the conviction that a balance of power with its mutual limitations
and restrictions is preferable to open conflict over contradictory goals.
Adjustment
This could exist as
(a) Accommodation: This
leads hostile individuals and groups to the reduction or elimination of
conflict through reciprocal alterations of behaviour. Accommodation has
been viewed as antagonistic cooperation and sociologists distinguished
several forms of accommodation which include:
i. Coercion: This
represents conflict resolution on the part of a victorious party whose will is
imposed on the loser.
ii.
Superordination-subordination: This promotes a form of
adjustment based on the losers’ acceptance of a subordinate (lower) status in
relation to the winning group which moves into a higher or superordinate
position.
iii. Truce: This
is a temporary agreement to cease active conflict for some period of time.
iv. Compromise: This
is reached when opponents of about equal strength agree to mutual reductions in
their demands and to reciprocal concessions.
v. Toleration:
This occurs when neither victory nor compromise seem feasible or desirable. The
opponents neither make concessions nor do they engage in open conflict. They
simply coexist with the tacit understanding not to do anything about their differences.
vi. Arbitration:
This is brought about by a third party whose resolution of the conflict is
accepted by the contending parties. This form of accommodation is usually
preceded by “mediation”(the efforts of the third party to bring the opponents together
in a compromise) and “conciliation” (or lessening of opposition through mutual
insight which may come about without the intervention of a third party.
(b) Assimilation: This
process fuses initially dissimilar individuals and groups into a social
and cultural unit based on shared attitudes, values and interests.
There are two basic
forms of assimilation.
i. Assimilation of
weaker individual or group: By this arrangement,
the weaker or newly arrived individuals or groups are absorbed by an existing
group. This is a two-way process. Individuals and groups usually do not
disappear into the dominant group without leaving some imprint on the structure
and functioning of the latter.
ii. Merger of different
groups: Different groups merge into a new combination
resulting from the blending of some original characteristics and the rejection
of others.
CONCLUSION
In this unit, social
interaction involves more than one person in interaction. Such relationship involves
symbolic actions that are in the form of verbal of gestural communication
through social interaction the individuals involved are aware of how others
will probably react to their sent or elicited massages. A number of key
patterns of interaction which are found in all societies are forms of social
bonds. One or more of these patterns are presented as social processes. It is
demonstrated in this unit that there are enough patterns and repetition that
make prediction of behaviour possible.
SUMMARY
In this unit, details
about social interaction were presented. Also the specifics of major social
processes were discussed. Each of these major processes was broken types that
could be found in it. The major social processes discussed included opposition,
cooperation and adjustment. On the final analysis, social interaction is said
to take place in all know human societies.
0 comments:
Post a Comment