Tuesday, 23 August 2016



Corruption can occur in any sectors, whether they be public or private industry or even NGOs. However, only in democratic controlled institutions there is an interest of the public (owner) to develop internal mechanisms to fight active or passive corruption, whereas in private industry as well as in NGOs there is no public control. Therefore, the owners' investors' or sponsors' profits are largely decisive.
          Government/public sector
Public sector corruption includes corruption of the political process and of government agencies such as the police as well as corruption in processes of allocating public funds for contracts, grants, and hiring. Recent research by the World Bank suggests that who makes policy decisions (elected officials or bureaucrats) can be critical in determining the level of corruption because of the incentives different policy-makers face.
       Political corruption: A political cartoon from Harper's Weekly, January 26, 1878, depicting U.S. Secretary of the Interior Carl Schurz investigating the Indian Bureau at the U.S. Department of the Interior. The original caption for the cartoon is: "THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR INVESTIGATING THE INDIAN BUREAU. GIVE HIM HIS DUE, AND GIVE THEM THEIR DUES."
Political corruption is the abuse of public power, office, or resources by elected government officials for personal gain, by extortion, soliciting or offering bribes. It can also take the form of office holders maintaining themselves in office by purchasing votes by enacting laws which use taxpayers' money.  Evidence suggests that corruption can have political consequences- with citizens being asked for bribes becoming less likely to identify with their country or region.
Police corruption: Police corruption is a specific form of police misconduct designed to obtain financial benefits, other personal gain, and/or career advancement for a police officer or officers in exchange for not pursuing, or selectively pursuing, an investigation or arrest. One common form of police corruption is soliciting and/or accepting bribes in exchange for not reporting organized drug or prostitution rings or other illegal activities.
Another example is police officers flouting the police code of conduct in order to secure convictions of suspects—for example, through the use of falsified evidence. More rarely, police officers may deliberately and systematically participate in organized crime themselves. In most major cities, there are internal affairs sections to investigate suspected police corruption or misconduct. Similar entities include the British Independent Police Complaints Commission.
  Judicial corruption:  Judicial corruption refers to corruption related misconduct of judges, through receiving or giving bribes, improper sentencing of convicted criminals, bias in the hearing and judgment of arguments and other such misconduct.
Governmental corruption of judiciary is broadly known in many transitional and developing countries because the budget is almost completely controlled by the executive. The latter undermines the separation of powers, as it creates a critical financial dependence of the judiciary. The proper national wealth distribution including the government spending on the judiciary is subject of the constitutional economics.
It is important to distinguish between the two methods of corruption of the judiciary: the government (through budget planning and various privileges), and the private.  Judicial corruption can be difficult to completely eradicate, even in developed countries. Corruption in judiciary also involve the government in power using judicial arm of government to oppress the opposition parties in the detriments of the state.
Corruption in the educational system: Corruption in education is a worldwide phenomenon. Corruption in admissions to universities is traditionally considered as one of the most corrupt areas of the education sector. Recent attempts in some countries, such as Russia and Ukraine, to curb corruption in admissions through the abolition of university entrance examinations and introduction of standardized computer graded tests have largely failed.  Vouchers for university entrants have never materialized.  The cost of corruption is in that it impedes sustainable economic growth.  Endemic corruption in educational institutions leads to the formation of sustainable corrupt hierarchies.  While higher education in Russia is distinct with widespread bribery, corruption in the US and the UK features a reasonable amount of fraud.  The US is distinct with grey areas and institutional corruption in the higher education sector.  Authoritarian regimes, including those in the former Soviet republics, encourage educational corruption and control universities, especially during the election campaigns.  This is typical for Russia, Ukraine, and Central Asian regimes,  among others. The general public is well aware of the high level of corruption in colleges and universities, including thanks to the media. Doctoral education is no exception, with dissertations and doctoral degrees available for sale, including for politicians. Russian Parliament is notorious for "highly educated" MPs High levels of corruption are a result of universities not being able to break away from their Stalinist past, over bureaucratization, and a clear lack of university autonomy.  Both quantitative and qualitative methodologies are employed to study education corruption, but the topic remains largely unattended by the scholars. In many societies and international organizations, education corruption remains a taboo. In some countries, such as certain eastern European countries and certain Asian countries, corruption occurs frequently in universities. This can include bribes to bypass bureaucratic procedures and bribing faculty for a grade. The willingness to engage in corruption such as accepting bribe money in exchange for grades decreases if individuals perceive such behavior as very objectionable, i.e. a violation of social norms and if they fear sanctions in terms of the severity and probability of sanctions.
Within labor unions:
            The Teamsters (International Brotherhood of Teamsters) is an example of how the civil RICO process can be used. For decades, the Teamsters have been substantially controlled by La Cosa Nostra. Since 1957, four of eight Teamster presidents were indicted, yet the union continued to be controlled by organized crime elements. The federal government has been successful at removing the criminal influence from this 1.4 million-member union by using the civil process. 

Methods

In systemic corruption and grand corruption, multiple methods of corruption are used concurrently with similar aims.
Bribery: Bribery involves the improper use of gifts and favors in exchange for personal gain. This is also known as kickbacks or, in the Middle East, as baksheesh. It is the most common form of corruption. citation needed The types of favors given are diverse and may include money, gifts, sexual favors’, company shares, entertainment, employment and political benefits. The personal gain that is given can be anything from actively giving preferential treatment to having an indiscretion or crime overlooked.
Bribery can sometimes form a part of the systemic use of corruption for other ends, for example to perpetrate further corruption. Bribery can make officials more susceptible to blackmail or to extortion.
Embezzlement, theft and fraud: Embezzlement and theft involve someone with access to funds or assets illegally taking control of them. Fraud involves using deception to convince the owner of funds or assets to give them up to an unauthorized party.
Examples include the misdirection of company funds into "shadow companies" (and then into the pockets of corrupt employees), the skimming of foreign aid money, scams and other corrupt activity.
Extortion and blackmail: While bribery is the use of positive inducements for corrupt aims, extortion and blackmail centre around the use of threats. This can be the threat of violence or false imprisonment as well as exposure of an individual's secrets or prior crimes.
This includes such behavior as an influential person threatening to go to the media if they do not receive speedy medical treatment (at the expense of other patients), threatening a public official with exposure of their secrets if they do not vote in a particular manner, or demanding money in exchange for continued secrecy.
 



Corruption can occur on different scales. There is corruption that occurs as small favors between a small number of people (petty corruption), corruption that affects the government on a large scale (grand corruption), and corruption that is so prevalent that it is part of the everyday structure of society, including corruption as one of the symptoms of organized crime (systemic corruption).
       Petty corruption
Petty corruption: occurs at a smaller scale and takes place at the implementation end of public services when public officials meet the public. Examples include the exchange of small improper gifts or use of personal connections to obtain favors’ or a speedy completion of routine government procedures. This form of corruption is usually pursued by junior and middle level officials, who are significantly underpaid.
     Grand corruption
Grand corruption: is defined as corruption occurring at the highest levels of government in a way that requires significant subversion of the political, legal and economic systems. Such corruption is commonly found in countries with authoritarian or dictatorial governments but also in those without adequate policing of corruption.
The government system in many countries is divided into the legislative, executive and judiciary branches in an attempt to provide independent services that are less subject to grand corruption due to their independence from one another. citation needed

       Systemic corruption
Systemic corruption: (or endemic corruption)  is corruption which is primarily due to the weaknesses of an organization or process. It can be contrasted with individual officials or agents who act corruptly within the system.
Factors which encourage systemic corruption include conflicting incentives, discretionary powers; monopolistic powers; lack of transparency; low pay; and a culture of impunity.  Specific acts of corruption include "bribery, extortion, and embezzlement" in a system where "corruption becomes the rule rather than the exception.  Scholars distinguish between centralized and decentralized systemic corruption, depending on which level of state or government corruption takes place; in countries such as the Post Soviet states both types occur. Some scholars argue that there is a negative duty clarification needed  of western governments to protect against systematic corruption of underdeveloped governments.

Corruption is a form of dishonest or unethical conduct by a person entrusted with a position of authority, often to acquire personal benefit. Corruption may include many activities including bribery and embezzlement, though it may also involve practices that are legal in many countries. Government, or 'political', corruption occurs when an office-holder or other governmental employee acts in an official capacity for personal gain. Stephen D. Morris, a professor of politics, writes that [political] corruption is the illegitimate use of public power to benefit a private interest. Economist Ian Senior defines corruption as an action to (a) secretly provide (b) a good or a service to a third party (c) so that he or she can influence certain actions which (d) benefit the corrupt, a third party, or both (e) in which the corrupt agent has authority. Daniel Kaufmann, from the World Bank, extends the concept to include 'legal corruption' in which power is abused within the confines of the law — as those with power often have the ability to

Tuesday, 2 August 2016

INTRODUCTION Formal organizations are product of deliberate actions that are goal directed. Hence, when groups (labourers, Administrators, Marketers etc.) are brought together in a production point or a complex organization, then a formal organization will naturally emerged. The erroneous conception of an institution as a group of people is corrected in this unit. But formal organizations are group of people. Central to all formal organizations are formal structure and formalization. These concepts are made clearer in this unit. Formal Organizations and Institutions When groups are deliberately brought into existence for the purpose of attaining specific goals in large or complex organizations, they are called formal organizations. A nation’s government is a network of formal organizations charged with the business of governing. A school is a formal organization designed to educate children. An army is a formal organization that takes care of the business of war and defence. A corporation is a formal organization performing some function in a nation’s economy. An institution is a procedure, an established ways of doing things, a pattern of behaviour, and a custom. Institutions are not groups of people. You cannot join an institution; you can merely do things in an institutionalized way. For example, when you marry, you carry out a human activity establishing a paired relationship, propagating the species-in an institutionalized way. Formal organizations are groups of people. You may join such organizations, or have dealing with their members. (a) Formal Structure The effort to coordinate efficiently the actions of many people toward a single objective leads to the development of formal structure. It is called “formal structure” following Max Weber’s formulation of the components of bureaucracy. (b) Formalization The concept of formalization permits that details of procedures are rendered explicit and unambiguous and thus rational. These can be put down on paper by reducing it to chart of organization that defines offices, codifies rules, specifies flow of authority and extent of responsibility, and indicates the technical competences that provide qualification for office. Analysis of Formal Structures The analysis of formal structures in large or complex organizations has often focused particularly on three issues. Authority: Formal organizations are designed so that, consistent with the hierarchy of positions, some positions have authority over others. In order that the occupant of each position will be able to carry out this task, sufficient power is provided in the form of control over resources and also control over people in subordinate positions by the capacity to reward or sanction (punish). Rewards: One consequence of ranked positions in formal organizations is an unequal distribution of rewards. Salaries range upward from that of the night watchman to the president. Other rewards-parking spaces, private offices, private secretaries, executive bonuses-may be available to some upper level ranks. Such an unequal distribution of rewards functions to attract talented people and to serve as incentive to people to be productive. An organization does not necessarily attempt to provide equity in distributing rewards. It may only pay what it needs to get trained people and keep them in the system. Communication: No complex organization can function effectively-or indeed at all-unless it has assured channels of communication. Channels of communication must be known to all participants, each member should have access to the formal channel of communication, the lines should be as short and direct as possible, and those communicating should make use of the appropriate line of communication, not by passing any link. Ideally each member will have access to what he or she needs to know but will not be over burdened with extraneous information. But effective communication in hierarchy often proves to be difficult. Information flows more easily downward than it does upward, and the middle levels often block or distort communication between top and bottom. Upper levels may even believe that the lower levels need to know only orders-what to do-and some occasional propaganda from the top, while those in lower levels may feel they need to know more. As consequence, informal and extra-legitimate channels of communication in organizations “grapeviness”, “scuttle-bult”, “rumour mills”-operate in the absence of effective formal communication. Characteristics of Formal Organizations A formal organization comes into being when a number of individuals join together for the purpose of reaching certain objectives or improving certain conditions. Formal organizations display certain definite characteristics. Firstly, they have a formal structure. Their goals and programmes for carrying them out are formally stated in policy guidelines, constitutions, and other bylaws. Formal organizations also include a body of officers whose relations with one another and with other members of the organization are specified in writing. Second, they are relatively permanent. Some formal organizations, especially those established for profit making, may prove to be temporary if no profit is made. The expectation, however, is that a large scale organization will last as long as it performs its original tasks. Third, authority is organized in a hierarchical order. The leadership of the organization is assumed by a number of individuals who are ranked from high to low. The high-ranking individuals give the orders; the low ranking individuals obey. In industry the highest level of authority is the board of directors, who select officers and elect an executive committee. The board at the recommendation of the executive committee determines policy. An administrative executive carries out this policy, helped by an assistant, who in turn has a staff to assist him. Fourth, formal organizations have a formal programme of which all members are aware, by which to attain their goals. Relationships among members are systematic and complex. People relate to others whose authority and functions differ from their own-people of higher or lower rank-according to guidelines specified in the programme. CONCLUSION While formal organizations are made up of groups that are deliberately brought in complex organizations to achieve specific goals, institutions are procedures, established ways of doing things and a pattern of behaviour among others. Formal organizations exhibit common characteristics that are discussed in this unit. SUMMARY In this unit, efforts have been made to distinguish formal organizations from institutions. Furthermore, the issues in the analysis of formal structures were presented. Lastly, the distinctive features of formal structures were discussed.

INTRODUCTION In modern world, ever-larger (complex) organizations rise to dominate the social landscape, commanding a greater share of the social resources, ever greater social power, and proving to be effective mechanisms for organizing large aggregates of people in the pursuit of social goals. Complex organizations are not all alike. Political parties, business, firms, voluntary civic groups, governmental agencies, hospitals, prisons, universities and armies are all large or complex organizations. Yet all are different from one another in goals they pursue and in the kind of amount of resources they command Although variations in size and in purpose distinguish large organizations from one another, what is probably most common to them is a tendency to move forward formalization and then bureaucracy. It is this development in complex organizations that will be the concern of this unit. Basic Concepts of Organizations i. Defining an Organization An organization is a persistent social system with a collective identity and a programme of planned activity directed toward the achievement of explicit goals. ii. Organizational Positions A position is a category of membership in an organization whose incumbents are expected to enact a set of roles that are part of the organizational programme. iii. Organizational Status and Hierarchy The status of an organization position is its place in the distribution of social power prescribed by the organization. Such a distribution is called a “hierarchy”, and every organization has one. iv. The Organizational Pyramid This is the diagram-somewhat resembling a population pyramid that shows the number of status levels in a hierarchy and the number of members at each level. v. A table of Organization This is a device for describing the structure of an organization graphically. It locates position vertically by status and horizontally by function. But no real life organization can fit exactly to the pattern of operation prescribed for it. vi. Bureaucracy This is the type of organization that handles a large volume of routine activities by means of impersonal standardized procedure. It is characteristically modern type of organization that develops along with technological progress. Organizational Size Organizations can be conveniently arranged in four categories of size as follows: i. A Small Organization This organization is small enough for every member to know every other and to interact with him directly. The upper limit is about thirty (30) members, although a very durable small organization may be somewhat larger. ii. A Middle-sized Organization This is too large to permit development of a relationship between every pair of members but small enough so that certain key members can interact directly with all the others. The upper limit is about a thousand. iii. A Large Organization This is too large for any member to interact directly with all of the others, but small enough for all or most of the members to be assembled at one time in one place. The upper limit of large organizations is variable but lies in the neighbourhood of 50, 000 members. iv. A Giant Organization This has too many members too widely dispersed for all of them ever to be assembled at one time and place. Its leaders are known to the rank and file through communication media, and no leader is personally acquainted with more than a small fraction of the membership. An organization’s chances of survival seem to increase directly with its size. Size and efficiency appear to be correlated also in types of organization whose efficiency is harder to measure than of a business corporation such as schools, research institute and political parties. Furthermore, larger organizations are generally less effective in providing satisfaction to their members. Alienation – the loss of interest in the purpose toward which one’s own activity is directed – is a perennial problem of larger and giant organizations. On the final analysis larger and giant organizations are better classified as complex organizations than other brands. The Nature of Complex Organizations Complex organizations are not all alike. Political parties, business, firms, voluntary civil groups, governmental agencies, hospitals, prisons, universities, and armies are all complex organizations, yet all are different from one another in the goals they pursue, and in the kind and amount of resources they command, if they are all large, however they are not equally so, for what is large can be equally anything from a departmental store or a social service agency to the General Motor Corporation or the Department of Defence. Common Tendencies of Complex Organizations Although variation in size and purpose distinguish large organizations from one another, the following are their aspirations and tendencies. (a) Goal Specificity Complex or formal organizations are constructed for the pursuit of relatively specific objectives. It is goal-specificity that makes it possible for organizations to build a rational structure – that is, one in which activities are organized so as to lead efficiently to a previously defined goal. The more clearly and precisely an organization defines its goals, the more able is it to construct a rational structure. Goal specificity is a matter of degree, not an all or nothing matter. Some organizations are more specific than others about their goals. For example, universities are often less specific than a business firm or a government agency. If the goals of complex organization are specific, they are not unchangeable. Even in such organizations as business firms, specific goals first established are subject to change over time, as circumstances change and as different groups within the organizations reshape goals to suit their particular interest. In changing circumstances, goals may become too costly, or even unattainable. In some cases full success in attaining a goal may no longer justify putting so much of the organization’s resources into it. (b) Formalization The structure of an organization is “formal” when its positions and relations among them are officially and explicitly designated, independently of the characteristics of the persons who might occupy the positions. It is possible to draw a diagram of a formal structure \, to picture it as a series of offices which rank above and below one another on a chart of organization (organogram or organizational chart). Office holders perform specialized functions and are governed by written rules and regulations. Like goal-specificity, formalization is a matter of degree; some organizations have formalized their structures more thoroughly than have others. (c) Bureaucratization Formalization makes the rules, the authority and the functions of office explicit (or clear). Bureaucratization caries this one step further; it is the development of administrative staff whose task is the control and coordination of the formal structure of an organization. What the owner manager of an enterprise once did himself (and still does in small organizations) is now subdivided among a number of specified functions, such as personnel, sales, production, research, advertising and the like. Thus, when organizations grow in size, administering them requires a separate staff. In an organization that has been formally established, a special administrative staff usually exists that is responsible for maintaining the organization as a going concern and for co-coordinating the activities of its members. CONCLUSION An organization’s chance of survival depends on its size. That is the reason for classifying organizations broadly by their sizes. This affords Sociologists the opportunity to observe and predict the prospect of particular organizations. Goal specificity, formalization and bureaucratization are the aspirations and tendencies of every complex organization. SUMMARY In this unit, various basic concepts of organization were defined. Because of the importance of size for organizational survival, efforts were made to divide organizations into respective sizes. It is established in this unit also that complex organizations are not all alike. Inspite of their differences, there common tendencies were presented.

INTRODUCTION The Society is the largest social group. Members have multiple needs and society establishes institutions to meet them. Since human needs are numerous, the institutions created by the society are also numerous. To enhance uniformity and reduce duplication, Sociologists classify the institutions into broad groups. For contemporary classifications, Sociologists recognized only six (6) institutions. Each of these is presented in details in this unit. OBJECTIVES On completion of this unit, learners should be able to: · Understand the input of Sociologists to the basic classifications of institutions · Know the contemporary classification of institutions · Understand the basic functions of identified contemporary social institutions. The Range of Institutions Since institutions come into existence to mold ever human desire, they are as numerous as our many needs and interests. Institutions establish conformity for activities, which are as diverse as democracy, the money economy, education and fundamentalism. Sociologists have, however, made attempt to arrive at some basic classifications of institutions. The classifications include; (a) Sumner’s Crescive and Enacted Institutions i. Crescive (or Primary) Institutions: - Are those which grow in a “natural” instinctive way out of customs and mores. Economy, family, marriage and religion are examples. ii. Enacted Institutions: - Are those which develop through rational invention and intention. Examples are banks, stock exchange, joint stock companies and courts. (b) Spencer’s Principal Institutions Herbert Spencer classify principal institutions as i. Maintaining and Sustaining Institutions: Examples are marriage and family. ii. Producing and Distributing Institutions: - The economy is an example of these. iii. Regulating and Restraining Institutions: - These include ceremony, religion and politics. (c) Chapin’s Diffused (cultural) and Nucleated Institutions i. Diffused or Cultural Institutions: - They stabilize social behaviour patterns in such areas as language and art. ii. Nucleated Institutions: - They structure behaviour in the family, church, government and business. (d) Parson’s Relational, Regulative and Cultural Institutions i. Relational Institutions: - These are viewed as the basis of the social system. They prescribe (recommend) reciprocal role expectations. E.g. economic and family institutions. ii. Regulative Institutions: - Our interests are controlled by regulative institutions, which inform us of the socially sanctioned means to be used in our striving toward certain ends. E.g. family and political institutions. iii. Cultural Institutions: - These provide for the needed organization of our cultural orientations. Family and religious institutions. (e) Don Matindale Social and Cultural Institutions i. Social Institutions: - These are institutions organizing the attainment of instrumental values, which are means to an end. Educational, political and family institutions are examples of these. ii. Cultural Institutions: - These are institutions, which help in realizing intrinsic values, or goals set in the society. Educational, family and religious institutions are examples. Contemporary Classification of Institutions Spencer’s classification of institutions (crescive and enacted) is quite similar to that accepted by many contemporary sociologists. The following list contains fundamental or primary institutions, which are elemental and spontaneous in their origin and development and expressive of basic human needs. i. Marriage ii. The family iii. Education iv. The economy v. Religion vi Government Marriage: Obviously forms of marriage are different in different societies. But the purpose of marriage is the same: a man and a woman, or various combinations of men and men live together in a sexual union for the purpose f reproducing and establishing a family. This definition is the traditional one; today it needs o be amended as increasingly men and women marry to obtain affection and companionship, and choose to remain childless. The two broad subdivisions in forms of marriage are monogamy and polygamy. Monogamy is the union of one and with one woman. Polygamy is plural marriage, which can be subdivided into polyandry, the union of one woman with several men; polygyny, the union of one man with several women; and group marriage, involving several men with several women. Every society regulates its members’ choice of mates by specifying whom they may marry and whom they may not. All societies, for instance, require that marriage occurs outside a particular group, whether it is family, clan, tribe or village. People must not marry close blood relatives such as parents, sisters, brothers and in some societies, cousins. This procedure is called “exogamy”, or marriage outside the group. Societies also require that people marry within other specified groups. In simple societies, members must choose their mates from among members of their clan, tribe, or village. In such instance people may be encouraged to marry within their own race, religion, and social class. This process is called “endogamy” or marriage within the group. Another limitation on marriage – is the universal incest taboo: prohibition of sexual relations between mother and son, father and daughter, and sister and brother. The Family The family may be defined as a social group that has the following features: i. It originates in marriage; ii. It consists of husband, wife and children born of the union; iii. In some forms of family, other relatives are included; iv. The people making up the family are joined by legal bonds, as well as by economic and religious bonds and by other duties and privileges; v. Family members are also bound by a network of sexual privileges and prohibitions, as well as by varying degree of such emotion as love, respect, affection, and so on. The family has existed in two main forms (a) The Extended or Consanguine Family: - This refers to blood relationships. The extended family includes a large or small number of blood relatives who live together with their marriage partners and children. (b) The Nuclear or Conjugal Family: - This consists of the nucleus of father, mother and their children. For children such family is consanguine because they are related to their parents by blood ties. For the parents, such a family is one of procreation, because their relationship does not depend on blood ties but on having produced them. In different societies, families are organized in different ways. Families in which authority is vested in the oldest living males are called “patriarchal”. In patriarchal families the father holds great power over wife and children. Less common are matriarchal families, in which the source of authority is the mother. A variation of this form, referred to as matrifocal families, is found among the lowest socio-economic classes of many societies. These families are without a male head of household because the man has left the family or were unable to provide a living. The egalitarian family is one in which husband and wife has equal authority. Historically, families differ in ways in which they trace descent for the purpose of passing along the family name and determining inheritance. In patrilineal arrangement, family name inheritance, and other obligations are passed through the male line, or the father’s ancestors. In a matrilineal arrangement, the opposite is true, and descent is traced through mother’s ancestors. In bilateral arrangement, both parents’ lines determine descent and inheritance patterns. The residence of newly married couples also varies according to family organization. In patrilocal kind of organization, the couples stay in the residence of the husband’s parents. In the matrilocal kind, the couples reside with the wife’s parents. The current trend is toward neolocal arrangements, in which the married couple lives away from both sets of parents. The universal functions of the family include: i. Regulation of Sex: - Although the basis for marriage in many societies appears to be more economic than sexual, no society leaves the regulation of the sex drive to change. All societies attempt to channel the sex drive, so sexual relationships take place between persons who have legitimate access to each other. Most societies encourage marriage and give high status to married people. ii. Reproduction: - Ensuring the reproduction of the species has been a fundamental function of the family institution. In many societies, an individual does not reach the status of an adult until he or she has produced a child. Other societies attach no stigma to children born out of wedlock and provide for their incorporation into the family structure. However, in no society has the reproductive function been approved outside of the family institution. iii. Socialization: - Most societies depend on the family to socialize their young. In almost all societies, socialization within the family is the most important factor in the formation of personality. Parents play an especially crucial role in socialization. The chance is good that the child will develop into a fairly complete human being and will fit easily into the roles that society imposes on him if his parents offer successful models for him to imitate. iv. Affection and Companionship: - The need for affection and companionship appear to be a fundamental human need. Lack of affection in individual’s background may cause delinquency and criminality. Children who are given care in a faultless physical environment but who lack affection often become ill or even die. For many reasons, partners in marriage are not always able to sustain an affectionate relationship. And when such a relationship is lacking, there is not much left to hold the family together. v. Status: - The family’s function of providing the new member of society with his first statuses has remained practically unchanged. The newly born individual acquires the ascribed statuses of sex, age and order of birth, as well as the social, racial, religious, and economic statuses of his parents. The child begins life by inheriting the social class of his family. vi. Protection: - The protective function has traditionally been much more pronounced in extended families than it has in nuclear ones. For instance, in an extended family, each member is offered whatever help is necessary against whatever threatens him. vii. Economy: - The family in the traditional non-industrial society is the fundamental economic unit. It both produces and consumes the goods and services essential to its survival. According to an accepted division of labour, different members of the family till the soil, plant and harvest, build shelter etc. In urban industrial societies, these functions have been assumed by numerous other institutions that make up the economy. The change from a productive unit to a consuming unit resulted in a vastly improved standard of living. viii. Other Functions: - Among the other functions that were much more a part of the traditional extended family than they are of the modern nuclear one are recreation, religion and education. Religion Religion is a system of beliefs and rituals dealing with the sacred. Certain features of the human personality and some conditions of human social reality keep the need for religion alive. Science, which was thought capable of displacing religion, has so far proved incapable of doing so. People continue to reach out for something beyond life, and beyond science. Religion is functional in human society because it fulfills expressive needs such as the need to express ones feelings, to respond to objects and to feelings of others, to adapt, master and control physical environment in order to survive. (a) Specific Individual and Social Functions of Religion Religion provides a view of the beyond. It is systems that clarify and make human deprivation and suffering meaningful. On individual level, it provides emotional support in the face of human uncertainty. It offers consolation for human physical suffering, it furnishes a channel through which humans can search for ultimate meanings. It helps people overcome their fears and anxiety. Religion is functional to the society in the following ways. i. Establishment of Identity: - Religion contributes to an individual’s recognition of his identity not only in relation to the universe but also in a more limited sense, within his own society. Membership in a religious organization, in which people share in the same ritual, helps the individual to define for himself who and what he is. ii. Clarification of the World: - Religion clarifies the physical world, making it comprehensible, familiar and meaningful. In teaching beliefs and values, it offers individual a point of reference for his society’s normative system – for what is considered good and what is considered evil. iii. Support of Societal Norms and Values: - Because socialization is never perfect, deviance from social norms is frequent. Religion supports the norms and values of established society by making them divine laws. Religion is thus a supporter of the process of socialization. The deviant when breaking a norm is made to believe that he faces not only the anger of his fellow humans, but that he can also be punished by a supernatural, all powerful being. iv. Relief of Guilt: - Religion also provides a means of relieving the deviant’s guilt, as well as a way for him to become reestablished in society as a law-abiding member. Most religious organizations provide some kind of ritual for the forgiveness of sins. v. Legitimization of Power: - The supportive function of religion is vital to social control and to the maintenance of status quo. Every society is faced with the necessity of distributing power, for which purpose political institutions emerge. In legitimizing these institutions, the society has to justify the use of physical violence, which underlies power. Here again, religion mystifies the human institution by giving it extra-human qualities. vi. Subvertion of the Status Quo: - Religion may, conversely, subvert rather than support the status quo. The prophetic function of religion causes the beliefs and values of society to be considered inferior to the laws of God. Because of its subversive function, religion often leads to protests movements and to eventual social change. In modern times, the abolition of slavery and the passage of humanitarian law for the disadvantaged were caused, in part, by the influence of religion. vii. Feeling of Power: - Religion creates opportunity for feeling of power that members of a religions group derive from their special relationship with a superior being. viii. Aid in the Critical Stages of Life: - Religion offers the individual the needed support in critical stages of his growth and maturation. As individual develops through progressive stages, he/she is faced with new problems. Religion seems to help him to accept the new roles forced on him. It does this through rites of passage. The rituals have been established around critical times, such as birth, puberty, marriage and death. Some of the tensions the individual feels as he approaches a new stage of life are lessened by his involvement with the ritual. Common Features of Religion Although religions expression vary greatly from society to society, in their institutionalized form religions have some elements in common. (a) Beliefs: - In almost all known societies there exist religious beliefs, often spelled out in doctrines, or articles of faith. Beliefs probably appear after other aspects of religion have become established. Their function is to explain and justify the sacred and the ritual attaching to it. Within religions today, the role of religious beliefs has grown stronger. (b) Ritual: - Ritualized behaviour follows the creation of sacredness, and is an important mechanism for maintaining it. Any kind of behaviour may become ritualized: dancing, gathering in a specific spot, drinking from a specific container, or eating a particular food. Once something becomes ritualized, the behaviour and the objects involved are set apart and considered sacred in their own right. Ritual becomes a very important practice because it is considered to be the correct form of behaviour toward the sacred. It eases some of the dread connected with the sacred. By behaving in the prescribed way toward the sacred, people think that they are protecting themselves against supernatural wrath. (c) Organization: - The institutionalization of any societal function requires that it becomes organized. If religion is to remain effective, leaders must be recruited to make sure that there is always a place available for worship, that ritual is conducted in the proper manner, and that followers treat the sacred with the proper respect. (d) Additional Features: - All religions also have specific emotions, symbols and propitiatory behaviour. The emotions most commonly associated with religion as humbleness, reverence, and awe, although in some people religion awakens feelings of ecstasy and terror. Symbols, such as the cross of Christians, express the meaning of the sacred power. Church and temple attendance, prayer, confession, and obedience to the injunctions of one’s religion are additional symbols of religious adherence. 3.2.4 Education This is the formal aspect of socialization in which a specific body of knowledge and skills is deliberately transmitted by a crop of specialists. Humans lack a highly developed instinctual system. Consequently, they do not automatically know how to build the most effective shelter or how to find the best tasting plants. But humans do have the unique ability to engage in symbolic interaction. As they accidentally learn how to do certain things necessary for survival, they tell others of their group who may think of even better techniques. The accumulated knowledge becomes the essence of human culture, and every generation transmits this culture for the next generation. (a) Goals and Functions of Education What is called education is the institution that fundamentally functions to transmit the accumulated culture of a society from one generation to the next. The primary vehicle through which this function is accomplished is learned: the new generation must learn from the old, learning a process that has several components. The first component is change. Something must happen to the student as a result of the learning experience. The student should be a different person after the learning experience than he or she was before. The second component is interaction between the learner and the instructor. The instructor may be a teacher, or another student, or even a teaching device. In any case, the learning experience takes place in a social setting, or within a social system in which people play roles according to the expectations accompanying their statuses. Successful learning therefore depends on a satisfactory social system. The third component is substance. People learn or do not learn “something”. The something may be categorized as: (i) information and (ii) skills, such as reading or using tools. An additional category is the capacity to think clearly or to act upon a rational analysis of a problem. This should be viewed as a combination of the other two categories (information and skills). Learning takes place throughout our lives, in every circumstance. We even learn how to become human. Education in today’s society is considered to be formal learning that takes place in schools, or other specialized organizations. Society through the proper authorities must choose what to teach. What its children will learn. There is general consensus on the following categories of goals for education: i. Cognitive Goals: - The school must teach, and students must learn, basic information and skills. ii. Moral and Values Goals: - The schools should teach, and the students learn, how to be good citizens who hold the proper values for living and participating in a democracy. iii. Socialization Goals: - The school should make of its students well adjusted individuals who function well in interpersonal relations. iv. Social Mobility Goals: - The school should act as a potential vehicle for upward mobility, compensating for the disadvantages of poverty, minority, status, or unsatisfactory family background in those instances where the individuals were willing to work hard toward the goal. (b) Manifest or Obvious Functions of Education: These generalized goals represent the good intentions of a majority of society. The educational institution performs the following intended or manifest functions. i. Transmission of Culture: - By exposing students to the history and literature of their society, the schools help preserve the cultural heritage of the nation. ii. Recruitment and Preparation for Roles: - Schools function to help select, guide, and prepare students for the social and occupational roles they will eventually hold in society. iii. Cultural Integration: - In the society, schools have traditionally reinforced the values and norms of the majority. iv. Innovation: - In addition to preserving and disseminating past and present cultural knowledge, schools also function to generate new knowledge. This function consists of searching for new ideas and new methods of research, for innovative techniques and for inventions designed to solve problems and facilitate life. c. Hidden or Latent Functions of Education In addition to obvious functions of schools, there are other latent functions, which are unintended consequences of the process of education. i. Schools reinforce stratification (class) system of the society: - Students are sorted into different categories theoretically according to ability, and are then channeled into courses that prepare them for different job opportunities. ii. Schools perform custodial functions: - They act as babysitters of the day. They also ensure that children (under 16) will not enter job market in competition with adults. iii. The school helps to form youth sub-cultures: The fact that students are brought together for long periods of time results into formation of these. Some of these subcultures become deviant or counter-cultural. iv. Education affects attitudes: - There is ample evidence that education affects positively such values as egalitarianism, democratic principles, and tolerance of opposition view. The Economy The economic institution functions to tell each generation how to produce distribute and consume the scarce and finite resources of the society so that they can be used most efficiently by the members. It is a system of behaviour through which individuals in society make decisions and choices aimed at satisfying their needs and combating the problem of society. The study of the structure, functions, and general working of the economy is the task of economics. The term economy is an abstract concept that in reality represents specific relationships among people and group of people. (a) Basic Economic Principles and Terminology The fundamental economic problem of every society is that all human needs cannot be easily satisfied because of the problem of scarcity of resources. In the face of this perpetual problem of scarcity, each society is confronted with the following problems: · What commodities should we produce and in what quantities? · How shall we produce these commodities with the greatest efficiency? · For whom should we produce these commodities? People in different societies solve these problems in several different ways. · Some societies solve all their problems by relying only on custom and tradition. · Other societies allow these decisions to be made by command of their rulers or elected representatives. · In some societies these decisions are made as a result of the functioning of a market dependent on supply and demand, on price, profits and losses. Very few economies are based entirely on only one of the systems above. The goods and services that are produced in each society derive from the resources that exist naturally in that society. These natural resources are usually scarce. Resources are al those things that are necessary for the production of goods and services. Resources include the material things and the human energy used in producing goods and services. The human energy expended in production is called labour. Material things can be natural – land, minerals, water. These are called land. Man made material things – machinery, factories, shoes, and pencils are referred to as capital. Land, labour and capital are called factors of production because they are basic elements that must be combined in the production of goods and services. (b) Three Economic Systems Economic institutions are both cultural and social systems. They are social systems because people hold specific statuses and play the roles corresponding to these statuses. They are cultural systems because patterns of behaviour, values and expectations emerge around a system of production. These patterns are them made legitimate by a philosophy or ideology that the people accept as valid. The economic systems are: i. Capitalism The economic system came into being in Western Europe along with the industrial revolution. In this system of economic production, wealth came to be considered chiefly as the private property of the state or of a society as a whole. The principle of capitalism was that an individual invested his property with expectation of accumulating more property through his own work and enterprise. ii. Socialism Some societies have developed economic systems whose premises differ from those of capitalism. Socialism is one of such system. Its basic premise is the preoccupation with the welfare of the collectivity, with the whole society, rather than with the individual. All individuals are believed to be entitled to the necessity of life. They are not left to compete for survival, as under capitalism. In socialist societies, government levies high income taxes that help redistribute the society’s wealth more equitably. Individuals may own property, but only if the ownership does not deprive other members of a society in any way. Essential industries are owned and operated by the government in the name of the people, and the government controls and directs the economy in general. iii. Communism Like socialism, total government control and total income redistribution are the goals of communist nations. Such nations are theoretically determined to stamp out the profit motive entirely, as well as economic individualism of any sort. Individuals are encouraged to think and labour for the collectivity and work toward the even distribution of society’s resources, so that eventually a classless society may be attained. All the three economic systems lie at different points of an ideal option (continuum). What differentiates them is the extent to which the government intervenes in the economy. The Political Institution We experience political institutions in various ways. Politics is the process of acquiring and using power, and government is the ultimate source of legitimate power in society. The political institution includes a system of norms, values, laws and general patterns of behaviour that legitimize the acquisition and exercise of power. The institution also defines the relationship between government and membership of society. Political sociologists generally inquire into three areas. First, they want to find out about the social foundations of the political order-how and to what extent political arrangements depend on cultural values and social organization. Second, sociologist wants to know why and how individuals vote, why they hold specific political opinions, why they belong or fail to belongto political organizations, and why and to what extent they supported political parties and movements. This pertains to political behaviour. Third, sociological inquiry is also concerned with the social aspects of the political process. Sociologists want to know what type of groups people form for political purposes and what their patterns of interaction are. (a) Government Government is the institution that develops as a consequence of the need to maintain social order in the society. Government is a process that includes the group of people who exercise political power. The state, on the other hand, is the abstract embodiment of the political institution. The state is an institution that incorporates the institution of government. Government is the working, active arm of the state. Although individuals and groups that make up the government change with time and with administration, the state goes on. (b) Political Ideology Political ideology is a system of beliefs that explains, interprets, andrationalizes why a particular kind of political order is best for the society. Political ideology is graphically defined as concepts that: i. deals with the questions: who will be rulers? How will the ruler be selected? By what principles will they govern? ii. constitute an argument; that is, they are intended to persuade and to counter opposing views; iii. integrally affect some of the major values of life; iv. embrace a programme for the defence or reform or abolition of important social institutions; v. are, in part, rationalizations of group interest – but not necessarily the interest of all groups espousing them; vi. are normative, ethical, moral in tone and content vii. are (inevitably) torn from their context in a broader belief system, and share the structural and stylistic properties of that system. Those who advance a political ideology expect their followers to become totally committed to it and act on it. In other words, political, ideology is expected to result in political behaviour, its ideas translated into action. Political parties, social movements, interest groups and political system itself are all motivated by ideology. CONCLUSION Social institutions keep the society stable and goal directed, the society without the family and marriage, religion, education, economy and political institution in unimaginable. It should be noted that the problems and crisis these institutions’ experience will also be reflected on the society. The indispensability of social institutions for the society cannot be overemphasized SUMMARY In this unit, the ranges of institutions developed from basic classifications suggested by Sociologists were considered. Also, six (6) contemporary institutions as presented by Herbert Spencer were considered. Lastly, each of the contemporary social institutions wasexhaustively discussed.

Powered by Blogger.

Popular Posts

wapdut Archive